Zikula Community

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:20:20 -0500

Merry xmas BTW :-)

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:19:03 -0500

the system I am working on has urls like this: http://www.mysite.com/?1/news/world/sprot/rugby The only important thing is the ?1 this will work: http://www.mysite.com/?1 The same. So if you happen to change the title of an article, you will not lose the SE page as it will still exist. eg see how I spelled sport wrong? Well the url will resolve to the same place: http://www.mysite.com/?1/news/world/sport/rugby Because the everything after the id is not important. -Lobos

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:45:16 -0500

it's a very good introduction. Some modules define specific css tags and it's difficult to manage with third party templates. Of course, i'm for Human One rights ;-)

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:40:11 -0500

All of the ones behind me are also rewritten ;-)

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:34:57 -0500

[quote][url=http://www.google.de/search?q=sehensw%C3%BCrdigkeiten+kiel]http://www.google.de/search?q=sehensw%C3%BCrdigkeiten+kiel[/url][/quote] the two links before you, are rewrited :) [quote]1) Good Content 2) Good Content 3) HTML that makes it easy for a search engine to find out what the content is.[/quote] i totally agree with you, good content is the most important thing [quote] hat can only mean to me, that this is the Site's name and slogan[/quote] why ? you re not allowed to speak about more than one subject on your site ? they are talking about a "set of pages" not about a website.

Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:26:09 -0500

I simply don't believe that Google can only index you page if you fake that they are all static. Static HTML pages are not a quality feature. My example is this: Idrive a site about sightseeing in my town, Kiel. If you ask google for sightseeing in Kiel you find my site on the forth place with this URL: http://kiel.von-seiner-schoenen-seite.de/index.php?module=Pagesetter&func=view&tid=3&filter=category:sub:1 In my experience 95% of your ranking is related to 3 things: 1) Good Content 2) Good Content 3) HTML that makes it easy for a search engine to find out what the content is. Everything else might matter or might not matter. Nobody really knows. And if some Google guy says something that is like the Pope says something about Gods will: It might be true or it might be political... @come: If you say you get best results with 2 h1 headlines - does that mean, you tested both? I don't think that is possible, because while you change your site 1 Mio other webmasters change their sites and google mixes everything up again. IMHO there is far too much speculation in SEO to be anything near scientific and a guideline for Postnuke development. We should concentrate on producing well structured, meaningful output. And if the W3C says, that a set of pages has a common h1 title that can only mean to me, that this is the Site's name and slogan. If you take this title and combine it with the first h2 in the title tag you have enough food for spiders on you page. And you also have a meaningful html document.

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:06:09 -0500

Oops - I should have added it would be nice to have total control over the url which doesn't yet exist with pn. i.e. - mywebsite.com/article-specific-url.html That gives the extra little bit for seo, but as long as you strive to make the rest of the page properly seo'd without that, I find the website and content does just fine. :-D

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:02:02 -0500

I have many pn websites and I can concur that the ones without short urls do just as well if not better than those with. Every new pn website I make now, I do not bother activating the short urls. The big three search engines have no problem with postnuke generated parameter urls.

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:13:50 -0500

[quote]BTW: They also say Google doen't like parameter urls and you have to have short urls - I have a site without short URLs (I was too lazy to persuade Pagesetter) and for the interesting keywords I am always within the Top 10 - so don't take everything for a law, you read online.[/quote] did you try with or without ? you can't say that's it's the same if you didn't try both methods . for my first post, sorry about my english, but the first sentence was from me to say that the H1 tags is dedicated to a page not to a site the second sentence was a quote for the w3 link you give us to prove what i was saying

Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:41:49 -0500

[quote]Does .8 work like this?[/quote] Simply put, yes. Also, if you don't like the way a particular module's URLs are constructed you can add custom decode and encode methods (I've already done that on my site with some modules). In the news module, you can format the URL through the admin interface using a number of variables such as the title, date, story id and so on.