http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm PostNuke CMS Newsfeed en-gb http://community.postnuke.com/images/logo.gif http://community.postnuke.com/ pnwebmaster@postnuke.com http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25939 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:21:00 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25939 so what happened? do we get a new RC or what ? http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25923 Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:34:37 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25923 The fact that a module exists (Content) that needs a new RC to run seems to imply another RC would be a good idea. http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25907 Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:15:22 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25907 I vote for RC3 too. Why? because most of users never picked up any SVN/NOC versions. With RC3 more people will start to test/use it and this way the final version could be better/more reliable. http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25906 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:27:41 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25906 Though I cannot wait for $newname to come out, I think that Developers, big and small, would benefit from another RC. This will give everyone a great perspective of what to expect in $newname 1.0, and not require any svn checkouts. http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25903 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:22:07 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25903 I think, that the RC3 is the best idea at the moment :-) http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25902 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:38:30 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25902 Hmmm...I stand corrected. :-P http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25901 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:48:52 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25901 I would definetely wait with introducing $newname, when most bugs are fixed. So new users will have a good first impression of $newname and it would get a good reputation. http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25900 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:38:16 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25900 You folk are awsome. I agree with the majority here, give it an RC and release $newname in a month or so... don't let it go far beyond that though. http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25899 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:22:47 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25899 Again, Thanks for all of your hard work. RC3 seems appropriate. http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25898 Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:15:02 +0000 http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2884.htm#comment25898 Now, it seems that it would be better another RC. Then, when you have registered the $newname, the final release.