<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>pnCommunity</title>
	<link>http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm</link>
	<description>PostNuke CMS Newsfeed</description>
	<language>en-gb</language>
	
	<webMaster>pnwebmaste&#114;&#064;&#112;ostnuke.com</webMaster>
			<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment26052</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:41:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment26052</guid>
			<description>more information about custom titles (see 58)
http://www.searchenginegenie.com/seo-blog/2008/03/150-questions-answered-by-google.html</description>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25978</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25978</guid>
			<description>one last think, if you offer a RSS xml version of your new, cut the description, [b]some feeds leecher are using to create an articifial content for their website.[/b]</description>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25937</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25937</guid>
			<description>thanks for this comment (i was affraid you didn't like it [url=http://community.postnuke.com/Article2873.htm]see[/url])

it works well on my discussion board ^^ (but i didn't do any comparison)

and even without thinking about seo, don't you think the users like a short and clear title in theirs results rather than a long  
[url=http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&amp;safe=off&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:fr:official&amp;hs=Dk0&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=spell&amp;resnum=0&amp;ct=result&amp;cd=1&amp;q=seo+for+postnuke&amp;spell=1]one [/url] :-) </description>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25936</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25936</guid>
			<description>Oh I forgot: Are the improved titles really better? I mean: title is a pretty important tag and it's content is regarded valuable. So IMHO it's a good place to store important words.</description>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title></title>
			<link>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25935</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://community.postnuke.com/http://community.postnuke.com/Article2887.htm#comment25935</guid>
			<description>Hi Mumuri!

Thank you very much for your article! Although SEO sometime seems to be the 21st century version of Alchemy: There are some nice tipps in it. ;-)

The idea with customized meta-decriptions is nice - Google's webmaster tools suggest that they are still of value to them. And I already thought about how to fix it.</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>